Bolton and Yoo: Why Rush to Cut Nukes?

| | TrackBacks (0)
Bolton and Yoo: Why Rush to Cut Nukes?

The Moustache and The Lawyer team up to write the stupidest op-ed in the known universe, making the case that the Founding Fathers' constitutional intent, recently reaffirmed and ratified by The People, would be to deny ratification of nuclear-arms treaties, which as we all know, was a burning issue in the late 18th century. But seriously. Isn't the Boalt School of Law at U.C. Berkeley just a wee bit embarrassed that it still employs (the tenured) John Yoo? What were the editors of The New York Times thinking? Why would they publish something this ridiculous? - TAPPED

It seems to be a conviction, shared by Yoo and Bolton, that the US should make its own rules on the world arena and damn the consequences. As Bolton himself once said:

There is not that much difference between me and the people who want a world where no government has nuclear weapons. I only want one government to have nuclear weapons.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Bolton and Yoo: Why Rush to Cut Nukes?.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

UC Berkeley Billboard

press conference, protest, photos, video, reports

Donations via PayPal
are not tax deductible.

Events & Calendars

War Criminals Watch Events

Important Reading

Physicians for Human Rights
Broken Laws, Broken Lives

NLG White Paper

The President's Executioner

Detention and torture in Guantanamo

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry published on November 14, 2010 1:58 AM.

Waterboarding is Immoral was the previous entry in this blog.

Yoo Watch is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.