Remove the fancy distinctions: the government cannot defeat constitutional guarantee by rerouting its planes from Guantánamo to Bagram.

| | TrackBacks (0)
"Does the public interest in national security allow the U.S. to detain aliens overseas indefinitely?" - Richard A. Epstein 

Al-Maqaleh v. Gates is the latest chapter in this debate. In late May a panel for the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia--consisting of David Sentelle, a Reagan appointee; Harry Edwards, a Carter appointee; and David Tatel, a Clinton appointee--took another wrong turn in the road. Their unanimous decision held that three persons taken captive outside the U.S. and detained for over seven years at the United States' Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan could not challenge the legality of their detention in federal district court...

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Remove the fancy distinctions: the government cannot defeat constitutional guarantee by rerouting its planes from Guantánamo to Bagram..

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.firejohnyoo.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1334

UC Berkeley Billboard

press conference, protest, photos, video, reports

Donations via PayPal
are not tax deductible.




Events & Calendars

War Criminals Watch Events



Important Reading

Physicians for Human Rights
Broken Laws, Broken Lives

NLG White Paper
ON THE LAW OF TORTURE...

The President's Executioner

Detention and torture in Guantanamo



About this Entry

This page contains a single entry published on June 1, 2010 10:47 AM.

Boalt Hall's purported emphasis on excellence and ethics was the previous entry in this blog.

new video: "Guantánamo: A conversation this side of the wire" is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Login

  AUTHOR'S LOGIN

Contact

  info@firejohnyoo.net