Torture report altered; Bush administration lawyers showed "poor judgment"

| | TrackBacks (0)
"While the probe is sharply critical of the legal reasoning used to justify waterboarding and other "enhanced" interrogation techniques, NEWSWEEK has learned that a senior Justice official who did the final review of the report softened an earlier OPR finding. Previously, the report concluded that two key authors--Jay Bybee, now a federal appellate court judge, and John Yoo, now a law professor--violated their professional obligations as lawyers when they crafted a crucial 2002 memo approving the use of harsh tactics, say two Justice sources who asked for anonymity discussing an internal matter. But the reviewer, career veteran David Margolis, downgraded that assessment to say they showed "poor judgment," say the sources. (Under department rules, poor judgment does not constitute professional misconduct.) The shift is significant: the original finding would have triggered a referral to state bar associations for potential disciplinary action--which, in Bybee's case, could have led to an impeachment inquiry...

Jeff Kaye studies the choice of David Margolis to "defang" the report here. 

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Torture report altered; Bush administration lawyers showed "poor judgment".

TrackBack URL for this entry:

UC Berkeley Billboard

press conference, protest, photos, video, reports

Donations via PayPal
are not tax deductible.

Events & Calendars

War Criminals Watch Events

Important Reading

Physicians for Human Rights
Broken Laws, Broken Lives

NLG White Paper

The President's Executioner

Detention and torture in Guantanamo

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry published on January 30, 2010 1:00 AM.

Torture: academia's godchild was the previous entry in this blog.

End John Yoo's War OF Terror is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.